Take That You Beast Part Two! River Plate Project Progress

 Back in September I said that I was going to experiment with WW2 naval gaming, using the Battle of the River Plate as a test project.  Working relatively quickly, I've been able to get my initial order of 1/2400 ships from GHQ painted.  Here is "the Beast", the Graf Spee, sailing serenely on a Geek Villain mat.

Leander-class light cruiser:

HMS Exeter:

Commodore Harwood's squadron in search of the Graf Spee:

"I say, sir, I do believe we've found her!"  Litko splash markers.

I had a very positive experience with the Naval Thunder: Battleship Row rules by Harry Pratt, which I found for purchase as a download from Wargames Vault.  I'm grateful to Keith who runs the excellent Across the Table blog for putting me on to these rules.    Since NTBR uses a written orders and simultaneous movement system (seems to be a hallmark of naval rules!), it is not ideal for solo play, but I suspect with some more thought I could write some general battle plans for both sides with some die rolls for the commander's likely reaction as the situation evolves.  An even better solution would be an opponent!

I was only using the basic NTBR rules and found them easy enough to learn.  The d10 system provides for some unpredictability, and shooting is not easy at the larger ranges.  When a shell does hit, there is a step to assess penetration vs armour (each ship has a data card which can be printed before the game and which provides this information readily).  Penetrating hits cause damage (different shells have different damage ratings, and each hit reduces a ship's hit points) but also cause critical hits, which can be quite dramatic.   There are advanced rules for crew quality, torpedoes, aircraft, etc, but I kept the first game simple.

The RN player has to put his head down and run at the Spee to get within effective range, and this means the Spee has several turns to inflict damage, as happened in the actual fight with the crippling of Exeter.   In my game, Achilles in the lead followed by Ajax attacked on one side, while Exeter tried to get on the other side of Spee.  This gave the Germans time to hammer Achilles with 11" shells, crippling her gunnery and causing a fire.   Here we see Achilles turning away from the fight and on fire, making smoke to hide her escape.   Her brave New Zealand crew never did get the fire under control and she soon sank (more Litko markers).

However, Ajax was relatively unharmed and struck a blow, causing a fire amidships.   Spee's crew could not extinguish the fire, and it spread, detonating a secondary magazine and causing significant damage.  Captain Langsdorf was now seeking to withdraw and fight another day.  By this time, Exeter was adding her fire, though reduced because her aft turret had been knocked out.  Her first salvo missed, but a second landed two fatal hits.  The first caused flooding damage, but the second hit the main magazine (two "O"s on 2d10) and the mighty pocket battleship blew up with few survivors.

At least in this encounter, German propaganda can say that she died fighting, rather than being ignominiously scuttled!

I'm  now debating whether to mount my ships on bases, which would minimize wear and tear on the models from handling, vs leaving them as they are.  The Geek Villain seascape map is quite nice and I like the look of the models sans bases.   This requires a good ponder.   In the meantime, another order from GHQ will soon allow me to fight the Battle of the Denmark Strait, although that order is currently in limbo due to a Canada Post strike.

Thanks for reading.  Cheers, and blessings to your die rolls!

Perry Brothers ACW Union Cavalry Muster Into Service

"Around her neck, she wore a yellow ribbon ...and if you asked her, why it was she wore it, she said it was for her lover who was in the cavalry."

I might have been whistling that tune as I finished flocking these troopers the other day.   They represent the contents of a Perry Brothers box of plastic 28mm American Civil War cavalry, assembled and painted as Union cavalry.  I could have assembled the figures with carbines or pistols in hand, but the look of the sabres is iconic, even though probably not very common in the later war period.  At any rate, I'm very happy to muster this new unit into service.

Not a huge complaint, but after painting the three mounted Roman gents I showed here recently, these Perry figures felt like a slight step down in quality.   To be fair, the Perry brothers were fairly early adopters of injection plastics, a decade or so ago now, whereas Victrix is probably benefiting from newer design and production technologies.  the Victrix human faces are sharper, and the horses have much more texture in muscles, manes and tails.     However, when you paint a dozen of the Perry figures, the overall impression is still impressive.

This batch was mostly painted using Foundry paints.  The tri-tone system gives good results for the horses, and the Union blue for the tunics and kepis looks especially good.  I free-handed the yellow piping, and some came out better than others, especially the tunic collars.  The flag is by Adolfo Ramos.

These gallant lads, together with what's already in my collection, gives me two brigades of Union cavalry, or three groups of eight, depending on the rules and game scale.   There are many mounted actions that would make great games, such as the cavalry encounters before Gettysburg or actions in the Valley, so we may some rebel riders in the painting queue at some point.

Thanks for looking.  Blessings to your brushes!

MP+

A Second Look at Mark Herman's Rebel Yell: Chancellorsville

Back in July, I posted here on my first thoughts about Mark Herman's much discussed ACW game, Rebel Fury, published earlier this year by GMT.  It's a fairly simple, divisional level game that covers six battles:  Fredericksburg, Chancellorsville, Chickamauga, Chattanooga, The Wilderness and Spotsylvania.  The mechanics are very similar to Dan Fournie's ancients game, Baetis Campaign, published in C3i magazine earlier this year and reviewed here.

Chancellorsville (henceforth referred to as Cville) uses the same map as the solo introductory game, Fredericksburg, which frankly was not a lot of fun.   Cville promises more sport for the Union as half the federal forces begin on the south side of the map, at Fredericksburg,  under Sedgewick, while the other half enter from the north map edge under Hooker.   The Union has the initiative for two turns, as per the game's Turning Movement rules, but after that the Confederates inevitably get to move first because of their superior generals, Lee and Jackson. 

Playing solo, I found it posed an interesting challenge for the rebs:  how many divisions should I pull out of the entrenchments across the Rappahannock from Fredericksburg to send north to try and stop Hooker?   In my solo game, the answer was just enough to slow the Union forces on either end of the map.   As you can see below, the Union came close to their victory conditions, establishing a road route from south to north that is entirely more than two hexes removed form any Confederate unit, while likewise clearing the rail line south from Fredericksburg from Confederate influence.    I got close, but not close enough.

However, if you look at the little red cross "Casualty" markers in the photo below, that is history repeating itself with a vengeance, as both Jackson and Lee became casualties, or at least enough of their HQ staffs to render them hors de combat.  Herman has a clever rule whereby one can use a commander's combat rating, called "battle stars", to influence a fight, but there is a good chance that the commander will become a casualty.   As the Confederate player, one has to resist the temptation to use the commanders in combat roles.   For the Union player, at least in this scenario, Sedgewick and Hooker have less ability to influence a combat outcome, so it's best leaving them in maneuver mode so they can enable their units to cover more ground, and for the Union, maneuver, as I learned, is the key to success.  

Judging by this podcast, not everyone is sold on this system, but I like what I've played of it so far, and I would be interested to retry this scenario to see if I could manage a Union victory.  

Rebel Fury offers beautiful maps, well produced components, and an intriguing variant on the IGO / UGO movement mechanic.  Definitely worth a look for ACW boardgame fans.

Blessings to your die rolls,

MP+

Three Victrix Imperial Roman Generals

I continue to be pleased with the quality of Victrix figures and by how well they take paint.  Here are three 28mm Early Imperial big cheeses to lead my numerically tiny Roman forces.  I like the fellow on the left because he's old and cranky and it probably hurts to climb on his horse in the morning.    I feel a certain kinship with him.

Mostly I used Foundry tri-tone paints, especially on the horses, which I think turned out quite well.

The iconic red cloaks that you see in all the films.  For these I used Foundry British Redcoat, which looked fine to me.

Thanks for looking.  Ave, vale, salve!

MP+

"Take That, You Beast!": Getting Ready to Chase the Graf Spee

Fans of old British war films may remember that line, uttered by Anthony Quayle playing Commodore Harwood in the 1956 film, Battle of the River Plate.  It's a terrific Technicolour film and an intelligent account of a naval battle.  I have a hard time thinking of a better naval film made since, except (possibly) Greyhound.  The film is here if you want to watch it online.

Faithful readers of this intermittent blog (bless you!) may recall that I've said before that I don't need to take on any new periods, especially as I turn 62 soon and "Time's winged chariot" seems somehow nearer.   However, naval games have always intrigued me and after reading a terrific blog account of a WW2 naval battle in the Med, I felt I had to scratch this itch.

River Plate seemed like a good place to start, seeing as it only requires four ships and is an interesting contest between numbers and hitting power.   I was considering NavWar in the UK as my source for the models, but they only take postal orders and I've been thoroughly spoiled by online shopping.  Besides, I have lived through the era of sending money orders to the UK and (hopefully) receiving the models two months later, so i've paid my dues.

I selected GHQ in the US as my source, and while the white metal models are pricey, the 1:2400 scale seemed small enough to be manageable but large enough to be satisfying on the tabletop.   I was very pleased when this package arrived shortly after I placed the order online, with lots of  paper goodies stuffed inside the mailer, including an intriguing and old school glossy paper catalogue.

A sharp Olfa knife, a metal file, tweezers (mine were barely adequate) and super glue were all employed to assemble the models.  Each ship took about an hour, including breaks to keep an eye on whatever Toronto Blue Jays baseball game was on.  I present HMS Exeter, which soaked up fearful damage during the battle.

Leander class light cruiser, representing Ajax (Harwood's flagship) and the NZ crewed Achilles (which stars as itself in the 1956 film):

Force H assembled!

The dreaded Beast, the Graf Spee.   Some of the barrels on those turrets look a bit wiggly!

The next step is to paint these guys and try out the rules I've chosen, Naval Thunder.  There's also a naval fleece on order from Geek Villain and some markers from Litko.

More to follow!

Cheers and blessings to your super glue!

MP+

Some SYW Front Rank Russians

Another short post to show off some projects completed over this summer.

My Seven Years project uses 6 infantry figures on a 2x2" base to give the nice packed ranks that I associate with the period.    As part of breathing new life into units painted long ago, and now being rebased, I needed some more figures to flesh out my Russian units.  I remain deeply thankful that Gripping Beast picked up the Front Rank range, which I started collecting some three decades ago, but in small numbers as I was on a graduate student budget at the time.   Now I can afford to pick up more of these castings to bring the units up to the new standard.

These are painted in the famous red gaiters of the Apsheronsky Regiment, which was apparently awarded them as an honour after Kunersdorf where they "fought up to their knees in blood".  The story is undoubtedly exaggerated but it's a nice piece of visual chrome for the tabletop.

It's taken me a while to master the Zen like detachment necessary to paint multiples of the same figure, but one advantage of the method is that after a while the paintbrush just seems to know where to go.

I currently have over 30 SYW Prussian musketeers on the painting desk, and I'm still hopeful that I can get them all done before the leaves have finished falling.   We'll see.   At any rate, my SYW project remains one of my main lines of hobby effort and continues to be enjoyable.

Thanks for looking and blessings to your brushes!

MP+

 

Battle of the Brothers: The Baetis Campaign by C3i

Getting a lot of gameplay since it arrived earlier this summer is a boardgame designed by Dan Fournie and the centrepiece of the Nr 37 edition of C3i magazine from RBM Studios.    There is some debate about whether magazine games are really that great, but I've never been disappointed by the quality of the games published by C3i.

Dan Fournie has a number of ancients games to his credit, and this design focuses on a decisive battle of the Punic Wars in Spain, when Rome's Scipio brothers faced off against the Hasdrubal brothers of Carthage.   What I know about the Punic Wars is fairly limited, so I enjoyed the lengthy article that came with the magazine.  Essentially Upper Baetis was a double battle, as both sides, four armies under four brothers, were unable to concentrate their forces.  Historically the battle was a Roman defeat, but in this game anything can happen.

This photo below shows the game as it is set up.  On the left, the Romans under Publius Scipio in light brown face the army of Hasdrubal Gisgo in light green, while on the right, the Romans of Gnaeus Scipio in red and their Iberian allies face the Carthaginians of Hasdrubal Barca in blue.  The Romans have two camps to defend, and the Carthaginians have two towns to defend.  Victory points are awarded for towns/camps captured and sacked, and for units and commanders eliminated.  The battle is fought over two and a half days, each day divided into two turns.  Before the game begins, the Carthaginian player can determine how much silver to spend on bribes to try and persuade Rome's Celtiberian allies - spending a little with a reduced c chance of defections gives Carthage a VP, spend a lot with an increased chance of defections gives Rome a VP.   Whatever the strategy, some of the Celtiberian units will disappear on each night turn, so the Roman player has to use these units before he loses them.

The game system is surprisingly fluid and elegant, very reminiscent to the one that Mark Herman uses for the GMT game, Rebel Yell.    In both systems, players take turns moving units and can move them as often as they want until one player passes, at which point the other player gets a variable number of moves before the movement phase ends and they go to combat.  Units cease moving when the enter the Zone of Control of an enemy unit and are locked in combat.  The combat phase has a similar process, so a smart and lucky player can put pressure on a flank or an isolated unit, advance, and continue the pressure and even roll up the enemy.  It took me a bit to figure out the nuances of this system, but once I did I really admired it.

In this photo below, the round markers indicate the Commander's Intent.   Each commander has a 4 hex radius within which his units can maneuver and attack.  Each marker is placed at the beginning of each movement phase.  Once the movement phase is complete, the Intent markers are replaced with a marker indicating where the commander commits himself in battle, giving units a bonus in combat but with the chance that the commander might be killed in an adverse result, as the Scipio brothers were in the actual battle.

I've played Baetis several times solo, with both sides winning, sometimes Rome prevails on one side of the map and Carthage on the other.   When my friend James came over and gamely agreed to try it (hex and counter games are not really his thing), he took to the system quite quickly and won a decisive Roman victory.

In this last photo, a Roman victory is unfolding.  James has sacked one of my towns and Barca is dead, replaced by a middling subordinate.    

 One measure of a good game is that victory can go either way.  In Baetis, both sides are evenly matched.  The Romans have an initial advantage in numbers until night falls and their Celtiberian allies slink away, while the Carthaginians have a few superior units like the elusive Numidian cavalry.   While both sides have key positions to defend, maneuver and aggressive play is the only way to win, as James grasped quickly.  I think I have to call him "Hispania" from now on.

I am sure that Baetis would make an interesting miniatures battle if one had the figures, though it might need to be played on two separate tables.   C3i 37 includes counters for   a Beatis scenario in GMT's SPQR game.  However you fight it, it's a tense and interesting battle to play out.

Blessings to your die rolls!

MP+